Nearly 10% of the $3.3 trillion the U.S. spends annually on healthcare is wasted on “administrative complexity.” It’s widely viewed that this wasteful spending could be reduced if streamlined, standardized processes were used for administrative functions like billing and collections, credentialing, compliance, and oversight. But this isn’t news. Jennifer L. Ivey addressed administrative complexity 12 years ago in her paper “The Effect of Administrative Complexity on the Cost of Health Care in the United States.” And in 2011, it was estimated that administrative complexity contributed between 19%-31% of healthcare waste costs (estimated to be between $558 billion and $1.2 trillion). How can we resolve the wasteful spending on administrative costs associated with unnecessarily complex processes, a problem that just keeps growing?
Administrative Complexity: Complex administrative processes in healthcare organizations that are increasingly seen as unnecessary and are therefore leading to wasteful spending.
“The healthcare delivery system in the United States is fraught with inefficiency and unneeded administrative complexity, the elimination of which would significantly lower the percentage of the gross domestic product*.” – Jennifer L. Ivey
*Healthcare spending made up 18% of GDP in 2017 [source]“We’ve Got It Covered” In 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Donald M. Berwick, with RAND Corporation analyst Andrew D. Hackbarth, released a study on healthcare waste. Since then, programs have been created to address many of the areas of wasteful spending identified in that study. But, as one writer notes, “the problem is that even when these programs are successful, they add to the administrative complexity of healthcare. It’s like we’re trying to bail out our sinking boat, but instead of dumping the buckets back into the lake we’re dumping them on the person next to us.” Health plans – part of the “supply” side of the healthcare equation – know they have their part to play in this waste. So much so, the ACA mandated a medical loss ratio of 80% to ensure payers don’t spend too much of their premium dollars on overhead. Yet, when we talk to health plans about how they are addressing this issue, all-too-often comes the reflexive response: “We’ve got it covered.” Let us assure you: a third-party vendor partner here and there, a few cobbled-together systems, and some inefficient manual processes is nowhere near “covered.” Add to that recently-reported “widespread rates of poor consumer literacy,” which are costing health plans $4.8 billion annually, $1.4 billion which is attributed to excessive administrative costs. The need to combat the high costs of administrative complexity has never been greater. What are innovative health plans doing to minimize administrative waste?
- Decrease medical expense by 3-5%
- Lower administrative costs by 2-4%
- A 10x return on investment
Talk to ClarisHealth about how Pareo® can transform your health plan’s payment integrity operations.
More from Our Blog:
Are better-than-expected medical loss ratios in 2020 setting up payers to take a severe hit on profit margins in 2021? Go on offense by making moves that feature these 4 risk-mitigating hallmarks. Six months into the novel coronavirus pandemic in the U.S., the crisis...
Slim margins, fewer resources, and consolidation have made it harder for health plans to compete. Could balancing outsource vs insource efforts accelerate their goals? With shrinking margins, fewer and fewer internal experts, and increasing consolidation, health...
Health plan SIUs find deep learning models for fraud detection provide advantages over rules-based tools. The onset of the novel coronavirus pandemic highlighted a glaring weakness in rules-based FWA systems: the need to develop rules well ahead of their actual use...